Benny works in \u2018industrialised credit operations\u2019 in BNP Paribas Fortis in Belgium (mortgage and consumer loans and insurance, across the value chain including rate revisions, partial re-imbursement, credit recovery). The biggest challenge is management, the workforce like Systems Thinking.<\/p>\n
Benny Devos talks about how they started with McKinsey working on \u2018process improvement\u2019. They used a stop watch to see how long it took someone to agree to a loan (it\u2019s incredible to hear that this still happens). They averaged the time across easy and complex decisions \u2013 without any knowledge or understanding other than a stop watch! After 6 months the motivation was low, the workers\u2019 council were complaining. They went for McKinsey Plus and added an \u2018emotional aspect\u2019 by involving people on the floor. Instead of a stop watch they asked \u201chow long do you think this task will take?\u201d \u2013 they averaged the guesses and started all over again (single loop!).<\/p>\n
Benny says once you get caught by Systems Thinking it never leaves you. He worked with Barry Wrighton.<\/p>\n
Purpose \u2013 what matters to the customers<\/strong><\/p>\n They invited 350 people to call customers who had loans, or refused loans, to hear what they expected of us. The easiest way to find out what matters to the customer is to ask them. Logic such as \u201cI know customers because I am one myself\u201d is myopic. The results was they were not working in ways that customers valued. The branches were effectively \u2018crying for help\u2019. Instead, after the McKinsey approach, if you had a file and couldn\u2019t make a decision (missing data) you had to send the file back, you could not phone them <\/strong>(because you would miss the target). When it came back to the branch, they couldn\u2019t do anything more with the file \u2013 if they could have they would already have done it. The branch weren\u2019t allowed to call the person who did the work, they had to call a call centre, who could only answer 50%. They had to escalate back to the group who identified the problem, who got back to the branch, who fixed the file, to send it back to the processing group. 85% of files were being sent back! This was very confronting \u2013 easier for Benny because he was new, but for the existing managers it was like looking at yourself in the mirror and not liking what you see.<\/p>\n Demand \u2013 type and frequency<\/strong><\/p>\n They worked with 1300 file s a day with up to 95% failure demand (the files were repeat files, after being fixed through help desk and second line support). The only measures they had were SLA\u2019s of 3 days. But the SLAs were for a complete file which lead to \u2018cheating\u2019.<\/p>\n They used a new kind of project language using \u2018bringing in, live with, get rid of \u2026 (process problem)\u2019<\/p>\n Capability<\/strong><\/p>\n There was an assumption that customers wanted a mortgage loan response instantly. Knowing that there was a 3 day SLA didn\u2019t help the fact that sometimes it was taking 25 days. The customer wants confidence they can get an answer within a promised time, with one visit to the branch. 85% of times the customer did have to come back to the branch. The measures we had were budgets, productivities and SLAs (internally foused at the department level). The new measures where varation, predictability of it, end to end custoemr times, iterations (numbers and kind of \u2026), help desk calls (number and kind of \u2026) and capability charts.<\/p>\n Capability charts focussed on the extremes; \u2018why is that taking so long? as well as ‘why was that so fast?\u2019<\/p>\n Flow<\/strong><\/p>\n They used Process Mapping<\/p>\n System Conditions<\/strong><\/p>\n There were two groups for loans; consumer and mortgage were separate. There was an assumption that people dealing with mortgages weren\u2019t able to deal with consumer loans. There were duplicate departments, managers, IT workflow tools (there was even a competition between departments). They found that the demand was cut into pieces to fit into the silo-ed parts of the organisation. HR rules meant that it was difficult to ask people to do different jobs.<\/p>\n Management Thinking Assumptions<\/strong><\/p>\n Standard Vanguard issues were identified.<\/p>\n After Check, Comes Redesign (Plan)<\/strong><\/p>\n The question was \u2018given what the customer expects of us, how should we organise ourselves?. The custom gives us a demand, we need to analyse, data entry and treat it. In the old system a demand was split into 5 or 6 different requests. It wasn\u2019t possible for people to handle every type of demand (they have 160 different types of actions that are needed). The goal was to have a maximum of one hand-off. Other goals were end-to-end, first time right, one stop and minimise hand-overs, only do the \u2018added\u2019 value work and a client oriented approach. They decided to be client oriented, rather than product-oriented by combing mortgage and consumer loans handled by the same people. The staff decided on the measures and the decision-making was integrated with the work.<\/p>\n Roll-in of progressive change<\/strong><\/p>\n They started off with small teams (4 people in the beginning) so not a big bang approach. They trialled the principles of the re-design. They had the right to experiment and make errors, and little by little it stabilised until the team said they could do more work and we increased the team to seven people.<\/p>\n They found that for some operations it took 32 days end to end involving 52 people. After redesign, it was simplified into \u201cdecisions + contracting\u201d \u2013> \u201cbranch\u201d \u2013> \u201ccustomer\u201d. There were assumptions that it would take 2 years to train people in contracting, but experience showed 95% of demand could be trained in just two weeks! The new redesign involved telling the decision makers to call the branch (previously prohibited). The result was 10 days for end to end with 42 people. The workload increased by 30% over that same period as well.<\/p>\n An example of mixed demand, where one customer had a mortgage and a consumer loan. They used to have to split it, but after the redesign where the team could deal with both requests as a single piece of work, the end to end times dropped from 15 days to 5 days. <\/p>\n Main Results<\/strong><\/p>\n The \u2018bring-in\u2019 phase resulted in e2e times for 28 days to 12 days, handling this with 20% fewer people involve. The workload was up 20% (+29% in amount of loans, +8% market share). In \u2018live with\u2019 e2e when from 10 days to 5 days, but they were able to offer more flexible mortgages with new features. \u2018Get rid of\u2019 if the customer needs help, they now start straight away, rather than waiting until they started the financial recovery process.<\/p>\n The Global People Survey across the bank showed that the groups involved had the highest motivation, but they were more critical of how well they were satisfying customers than other areas of the bank (possibly because they are more connected to the customers). Absenteeism reduced from 8.5% to 3.5% in 1.5 years. There were also no appeals in the appraisal exercise (previously there were 20 appeals out of 280, but last year there were no appeals). People are more motivated by the work than by the money associated with the financial bonuses. Last year they didn\u2019t use their discretionary bonus funds for \u2018paying off\u2019 (my words) dissatisfied staff.<\/p>\n What is management\u2019s role?<\/strong><\/p>\n The hardest part is working with managers and helping them see their new role. Their role becomes understanding demand, thinking outside in, engage staff, walk the process, allow staff to experiment with design and evaluate etc. Previously managers used to be specialists at solving tricky decisions, but now they have to become a specialist in training (moving from \u2018disablers\u2019 to \u2018enablers). They now need to create conditions that enable workers to reach their goals. They need to support and encourage the initiative of the workers. They need to ensure that the process \/ initiative is end to end. Also, building agreement with others outside the process.<\/p>\n Lessons Learned<\/strong><\/p>\n In Benny\u2019s experience, the managers who went through the intervention decided that they no longer wanted to do the new management role. They decided to step back and do other functions. They had 32 managers at the beginning and ended up with 19. You need leaders, not managers. It\u2019s not about big bang, but progressive change. Everyone agrees with the logic of Systems Thinking but stopping \u201cCommand and Control\u201d is not easy and requires vigilance, especially if the rest of your organisation is still using a traditional approach (it\u2019s a lot easier to stand still and follow the heard). Also, managers are often hired for analytical ability, but Systems Thinking needs more Emotional Intelligence than IQ\/analytical ability. The manager needs to have an enabling role, not a disabling role.<\/p>\n The roll-in started very small, with a small team, it made a lot of waves in the beginning, but the larger the team grew, the fewer waves that were produced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Benny works in \u2018industrialised credit operations\u2019 in BNP Paribas Fortis in Belgium (mortgage and consumer loans and insurance, across the value chain including rate revisions, partial re-imbursement, credit recovery). The biggest challenge is management, the workforce like Systems Thinking. Benny Devos talks about how they started with McKinsey working on \u2018process improvement\u2019. They used a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techpeoplethrivi-i2tkeoduos.live-website.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}